In the wake of a recent tragedy, the waters of enforcement for boaters who overcrowd their vessels are still murky.
After the high-profile case of three children who died when a 34-foot Silverton cruiser carrying 27 people capsized July 4 in Oyster Bay, another apparent overcrowding situation occurred, according to a Riverhead (N.Y.) Patch article.
A few days after the tragedy, five people packed a paddleboat meant for two on Wading River in Suffolk County, N.Y., and a wave overturned the boat. Riverhead police and other responders brought all who were thrown into Long Island Sound screaming for help — including a 7-year-old boy — to safety.
Despite wide public attention, officials say state laws in New York don't address the problem of overcrowding on recreational boats.
U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer is calling on the Coast Guard to set capacity limits for large recreational boats, according to a Newsday article.
Schumer, D-N.Y., also wants the Coast Guard to require that capacity and weight limits be posted on boats longer than 20 feet, according to the publication. The Coast Guard currently has capacity limits for boats less than 20 feet.
The parents of Victoria Gaines — the 7-year-old who was killed along with the Kandi Won owner's daughter, Harlie Treanor, 11, and Harlie's cousin David Aureliano, 12, in the July 4 accident — joined Schumer's call for the regulation. The rule also would require that, when posted, capacity limits appear visible to crewmembers and passengers.
The tragedy "never should have happened," Paul Gaines said at a press conference on Sunday, his voice cracking as his wife held a framed photo of their daughter.
Sally Drake, a spokeswoman for the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation, and Historic Preservation, told Riverhead Patch that all regulations about capacity on boats are federally determined.
No federal regulations exist regarding capacity on recreational boats sized similarly to the boats involved in the recent Long Island accidents, Drake told Riverhead Patch.
The Coast Guard can enforce safety equipment standards and cite boat owners who do not adhere to regulations.
Click here for the Riverhead Patch article and click here for the Newsday report.
The overwhelming majority of boats in use are *existing* boats. Fiberglass doesn't rot. Unless the regulations were to be made retroactive, they would have a vanishingly small effect on the total safety of the boating public.
Furthermore, there really isn't a good mechanism for administering such a law. The capacity and builder's plate requirements for small boats are *voluntary*. The USCG subcontracts private firms to check up on builders, but not on a production basis. There is no budget, nor personnel, in the USCG to handle the administration of a robust capacity regulation program for larger boats.
From a technical basis, the validity of any such plate depends on the specifics of a boat. Changes to the boat would have a marked effect. Repowering, redoing interiors, adding fishing towers, and of course the amount of gear, provisions and other equipment aboard affect the true capacity.
Finally, private owners are not required to be professional seafarers. The boating public does not and will not understand these nuances in a way that would allow them to assess these issues properly. What woulds an owner do if he added a tower? Or repowered from 230 HP to 400 HP? Would he have to apply for a new plate? How wold he know that? Would he be required to hire me to calculate the changes? How about operational equipment and provisions? How would that be captured?
As much as the senator wants to do good, I don't think it is realistic--unless we want to be like Europe...
Adding a capacity Plate is not as simple as just printing the label and sticking in on the boat. There are a lot of expensive calculations and trials that need to be performed, and might need to involve the services of a qualified Yacht Designer/Naval Architect. Even then, unless it were made retroactive ($$$$$$) there are a lot of older boats (example, 1984 Silverton 34s?) out there being used. The boat in question appears to have had an aftermarket radar arch and fully enclosed bimini on the bridge, those would raise the center-of-gravity if only slightly....but would a manufacturer need to test every possible combination of aftermarket add-ons? What about if an owner built a hard-top over the flybridge of his new boat, added a heavy Radar antenna, and maybe put a small rigid-hull inflatable on the foredeck, or worse yet.....on the flybridge hardtop?? Would a builder beresponsible if the boat capsized while carrying the rated number of people on a wake-tossed trip?
I think many if not all Flybridge cruisers built recently have a clear warning sign about how many persons can safely be up on the bridge, yet.....how is that enforced?
Let commonsense rule! If a boat is spotted underway in an overloaded condition, USCG, State Officers, or Local Harbor Patrol should terminate that voyage! If tragedy happens before the voyage can be terminated, then charge the owner/operator with negligence. Don't punish boatbuilders for the stupidity of their customers!!
Hey, Chuckie Cheese, leave the issue of anything to do with yacht construction standards, scantlings (look it up, Cheesie) and such to the REAL experts. That would be, in order, The USCG, The National Marine Manufacturers' Association, (NMMA) The American Boat and Yacht Council, (ABYC) and keep the bottom feeder politicians and liars, er lawyers OUT of it. Everything government TOUCHES turns to S..T!
27 people on a 34ft. boat !!!! and regards to a capacity post.. that did not work on the 2person paddel boat .. maybe a sticker on the captain that could say "what was I thinking" or stupid---- what a shame